This is not a logo designed by Apple. It was designed by the a undergraduate student of the Polytechnic University of Hong Kong. This logo was designed a few months ago, when Steve Jobs announced his resignation of his CEO position from Apple. Yet, it was not widely spread at that period.
This logo was widely spread around the internet, and social networking site right after Steve Jobs passed away recent. Perhaps you are one of the people who used this logo as well!
Can this recent online action / behaviour be considered as viral marketing? What do you think? A viral marketing campaign is usually generated by the company itself. However, in the case, from the design to the publicity, Apple has not involved in any steps of the "campaign".
I would say that this is a combination of User Generated Content (UGC) and viral marketing. I would then consider it as User-Generated viral marketing. The spreading of this logo is similar to a virus, but is constructive to the company, Apple.
Although you may not agree that this is a marketing campaign, it generated the marketing effect for Apple. This does not only greatly increases the brand awareness of the company, but also increased the stock price of Apple significantly.
So, what do you think about this "Logo" issue? Should marketers consider it as a marketing activity and try to develop marketing strategies like this new one?

